100%. I don’t know why others insist on confusing readers. There is no confusion in terms of governance. It is clearly stated on the website here:
One ApeCoin is equal to one vote. If APE that can vote is capped it would be a major risk of it being a violation of it being a governance token as some tokens would have their governance function revoked. Also it is likely to be tagged “Return for Reconstruction” for this reason: Proposal is at odds with the mission/values of the DAO as the proposal is at odds with 1 APE = 1 Vote.
FYI holders of ApeCoin have not been called Apes, that terminology was used for BAYC and MAYC holders. As ApeCoin Dao is separate to Yuga, holders of APE could be called Apers, currently we have no term for them, like we don’t have a term for people who hold BTC, ETH, USD, EUR, CNY, HKD, etc. We don’t put a $ sign in front of APE as we don’t put a $ in front of BTC. $ is specific for certain fiat currrency.
