Hi SmartAPE, happy to provide some clarity here.
The Guideline #4 I was referencing was this one:
This Guideline was invoked given that your proposal contains several points directly proposed by AIP-451. With respect to #1 you’ve included above (which is Guideline #5 in AIP-1, immediately following the Guideline #4 I’ve just referenced), this tends to be invoked when a principle tenet of a proposal would “conflict” with what another would establish, not propose the same points.
For example, AIP-436 calls for a 2/3s vote for allocations over $500k; AIP-445 calls for a 3/4s vote for all allocations over $150k. 445 would “conflict” with 436 if 436 were to pass, but does not propose the exact same idea. This is where Guideline #4 comes in.
I hope this helps provide some clarity here.