AIP-466: Proposal To Close Non-Essential Working Groups

[adventurousape]

The SC has the power through AIP-1: Proposing the DAO - Process.

@btang

Phase 6: Administrative Review

• This phase is only for Pending AIPs that have been tagged with “Needs Administrative Review.”
• When this happens, the Board, serving in an administrative capacity, will determine whether further action is required prior to a Pending AIP proceeding to Phase 7.
• Pending AIPs that the Board determines do not require additional action will be tagged as “Approved for Voting” and proceed to Phase 7.
• If the Board decides to return a Pending AIP for further clarification or action, they must provide a clear explanation of why and tag it as either “Return for Reconstruction” or “Return for Clarification.”

It was also mentioned in AIP-426: Special Council- Future election requirement and role clarification where it was clarified as well that reviewing AIPs was their main responsibility.

@coLossuss0x

Rationale: The primary responsibility of Special Council members is to conduct administrative review of AIPs.

Do agree that current system needs a revamp, but not so sure that centralizing things through the Foundation is the way to go.