Seeing as the issue of funding claw backs has appeared in a missive penned by @AllCityBAYC, for completeness, I am adding my response here as well.
There is no claw back in AIP-466. Please outline where you see this in the proposal. In fact, it specifically accounts for ensuring that not only are all stewards paid, but also that there is an orderly shutdown of the GwG.
As per claw backs, even the grants program run by the GwG being defunded is not a claw back. The GWG On-Chain Small Grants Program can just terminate and stop giving out grants. In that case, we can simply state that the grant program terminates at some point - or when it runs out of funds. It’s not as if this was something that the DAO was supposed to be funding in perpetuity. It’s tied to the GwG budget request. Heck, even ThankApe came back for a second grant of a larger 4M when the first grant was depleted. If that request had failed at vote, that would likely have been the end of ThankApe. It happens. We move on. It’s not personal.