It does make sense to remove the funding window. I’m fully behind this proposal @AllCityBAYC
1 Like
This part needs to be removed as it is misleading.
These attempts to circumvent the $250k/69% threshold will see us go from two scheduled votes a year (eight individual votes in total currently) for working group budgets, to potentially sixteen or thirty-two or even many more, and that’s only if we don’t add anymore WG bloat.
So can you explain how this increase in voting is being marketed/spun as a drive to “reduce voting fatigue”?
Thanks.
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
We have sent a list of follow up questions to the author.
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments.
Kind Regards,
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
@AllCityBAYC has responded to our questions and they are in our review once again.
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments.
Kind Regards,
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
This Topic has been rejected based on the DAO-approved guidelines due to no response in the last 30 days.
This Topic will move and remain in the Withdrawn AIPs category.