Words and definitions come with context. Here, the context of “locked” is improperly applied because you’re using it within the context of “locked tokens cannot be unlocked”, while using that as justification for why tokens should never be moved - let alone spent - because they’re locked. Don’t you see the problem in that argument?
I get that; but good luck getting that past admin review because my guess is that such a proposal to somehow lockup funds that the DAO needs will be frowned upon as it would literally go against the well-being of the DAO. And oh, I’m currently having an argument over here in AIP-467 which is going through admin review.
I don’t believe that we’re going around in circles. I believe that you’re holding a myopic view of how “locked” is applied in the context of our treasury; and you have thus far failed to address the vary salient point, that being if we locked the treasure tokens how is the DAO going to pay its bills, fund proposals etc. And at the same time, you’re over at 16.9million $ape will be sold to TL2 members - 75% discount applied - FIRE SALE! advocating to sell 16.9M of those very same tokens at a discount.