Had a look - it’s exact same topic as yours, only difference is the aim is specific to budget windows and removing them entirely.
On a side note - pushed back on it due to the pitch of “reducing voter fatigue”, when in reality we’d go from eight votes (two every six months for four WGs set in stone by dates), to possibly sixteen (each WG could have four budgets (due to 3 month conflict period) x 4 WGs), and then my thought was what if they don’t pass, resubmissions could bright us up to thirty two votes, then what happens when we add more WGs 
- reducing voting fatigue they say. 
No formula unfortunately. Originally I had a $250K cap. This would have made the 69% threshold non-applicable and removed the VETO power a few larger wallets now hold.
Thought that might have been seen as a bit combative and would have detracted from my aim - let the treasury heal and price go up (hopefully) - so 300k is a place holder tbh as i get more input from readers. 
Then I’ll go with a figure that’s more agreeable to the many and should pass.
So ngl I was very surprised not to see any comments on the $300k cap until now.
Do you have any thoughts/suggestions mate?
Thanks.