That’s an interesting find, I’m not quite sure what that means either BigBull.
Anybody know where we are on this AIP? I haven’t seen it go to vote.
1 Like
We answered the last round of questions 13 days ago and were told that the next step would be that the AIP would be sent to Administrative Review. I asked why it would need to go to Adminstrative Review and received the following message;
We have been sending virtually every AIP to Administrative Review as a means of checks and balances, and to have anything that might be deemed legally reviewable sent to the legal team once its there as the Facilitators do not directly employ a legal review during our reporting and analysis.
As for reasons a proposal would be Returned, we’ve documented each instance of a proposal being Returned for Reconstruction here if you’re interested in checking it out.
At any rate, your proposal is undergoing final Facilitator review before being sent to the next phase. I’ll be keeping you apprised of any next steps as they emerge.
3 Likes
Ah. No change. Okay got it. Thanks Ernest.
2 Likes
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
Edits have been made to this Topic, by the author, by the author’s request, or with the author’s consent.
You can click the Pencil icon at the top of the post to see these edits.
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments.
Kind Regards,
Strangely I can reply to a reply and not the original post.
I am not sure why this is necessary, especially a role with no control (like foundation director) or an operational role like Banana Bill. Please note this isn’t a requirement for the Suggested security council, Special Council (or the proposed reduced role) or other roles.
Also first name and last name if you are called Donald Trump is different than declaring a name if you are called John Smith.
1 Like
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
We have no further questions for @ernestlee. This AIP is now under Administrative Review.
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments.
Kind Regards,
1 Like
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
After review, this Topic submitted by @ernestlee has been “Returned for Clarification”. The Foundation waits for answers, and the community will be notified whenever the author responds.
Kind Regards,
Hi ApeCoin DAO Community,
@ernestlee has responded to the Clarification questions and they remain in Administrative Review.
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments.
Kind Regards,
-@Facilitators
Okay good. Thanks for the update! I’ll speak to Ernest about it.
Now more than ever we need to pass AIP-553 to get more transparency from the DAO.
Transparency report drops next week.
— Cam (@HeadofApe) May 9, 2025
It’s a bit delayed, which is on me. But it will also be a real reflection of wins and hard truths: projects that are coming, market headwinds, and challenges around meta-chasing and grant-hopping.
2 Likes
I agree. AIP-533 is still just as relevant today.
1 Like