I’m partially support this AIP as too many unknown:
ApeCo
- What is the ApeCo?
- For profit, venture or something else?
- Initial members and formation method?
- Who have the final say in ApeCo?
Sunsetting the DAO (aka ApeCoin Foundation, BANANA Bills, ApeChain, etc) and Launching ApeCo doesn’t solve the fundamental issues:
- Trust: The AIP approval to vote solely relies on the “taste” of the Foundation, some ridiculous AIP might just get to vote in a short period without due diligence, eg: AIP-455
- Efficiency: The AIP process can just be infinite with “Return for clarification”, “We have sent a list of follow up questions to the author.” while some of the questions had been asked or in the proposal.
- Proposal Conflicts: DAO does not allow competition between AIPs, which violates healthy competition and survival of the fittest. Moreover, whether it can be passed should be decided by the community.
BANANA Bills
- Passed on Jul 2024 with 100 Million APE and already allocated 31.2 million $APE by Apr 2025. It’s efficient in terms of capital allocation, but does it somehow do it too quickly, or healthy with the current status of treasury?
- Funded a few big names, but what the purpose and result? To add yet another ApeCoin deposit and withdraw channel? Not even a PR news/tweet posted. Are there any under table jobs in between?
- Funded for profit/profiting business from a near death DAO, isn’t that weird?
Yuga
- Not to doubt Yuga is one of the most successful pioneer in NFT’s space, but if Yuga are the controller of ApeCo, I’m here to worry.
- The ability of the Yuga team to take on another organisation again is in doubt as not a beautiful transcript in the acquisition of Cryptopunk, Meebits, Moonbirds, WENEW, Roar and building Otherside with studios, like Improbable, etc.
- Yuga had/hired the All-Star team and a lot of chief positions, but the impact is just as little as compared to the nobody startup stage of Yuga. It might be market conditions or over-promising, but we should still face the problem directly, shouldn’t we?
![]()


