Hey! Dunno why it shows up as 0 interactions but i have voted on at least a half dozen votes. One of the things i think is important about the committee going forward is making participation in the DAO more engaging and more interesting.
Most of the AIPs ive read since the beginning have been pretty boring (not in the good way) and didnt spark my interest to passionately vote one way or the other. But I am glad that you are making a point that there is very little participation to begin with
Not clear how to most easily convey this one, but have voted “In Favor” of last 5 AIPs, including the Live 142 and 121.
I do own an Ape, but choose not to use it as my PFP, nor do I believe I lack DAO participation. My “Member” status alone would hopefully attest to that.
This was an insightful thread and I’m glad you posted. It shows that many of the applicants are brand new to discourse. I hope that these metrics are considered when holders vote.
Minted apes, passionate about web3 and deeply invested in Yuga ecosystem. Started digging in and reading through the forum a couple months ago as I saw more people bemoaning lack of DAO participation on Twitter. Realized there was a great opportunity to become more active supporting a community I think about all the time. Began working on an AIP, realized as the SC elections came about that my experience could be useful as the DAO continues to struggle with growing pains. Have a plan to onboard 1 million new holders in two years by engaging culture-based sport communities globally. Carpe Diem!