I read the recent proposal for a 3 month extension of the Cartan Group LLC at a rate of $150,000 per month. I am ok with this extension because we only have 23 days left until the expiration of their contract and logistically there is too much value at risk to quickly shift to an unknown party without a proper onboarding procedure.
My proposal is that if we agree to extend their contract that we do so with the following guidelines
Disclosure of Roles, Duties and day to day activities. At a top level what are the big picture goals. At a granular level what are the day to day responsibilities. If the role is legally heavy or tech heavy we need to know to elect a person or business to handle those duties.
A gameplan for how we select a new person or entity after 3 months. My gut feeling is that given the gravity of this role this need to be a thoughtful process, and that the DAO should have an option at our choice to have an additional 3 month extension of the team so that we don’t find ourselves in a rush and randomly pick an unqualified entity
Once a new person or entity is selected a 30 day overlap to fully onboard that new person or team, familiarize the new party with the players as well as public and private dynamics. Even this feels a bit fast but we need to have a thoughtful handoff process in place
-Thanks for listening…
Josh Bobrowsky
Proposals submitted to the AIP Ideas category can be vague, incomplete ideas. Topics submitted here are not required to be submitted as a formal AIP Draft Template, however, you may still use the template if you wish.
I agree. 23 days is way too fast to make a decision of this magnitude. Having the information and a game plan like you laid out above is a great idea.
Not saying I want to remove the board members (I believe we should keep at least keep a majority of them) but in the event we do decide we want to replace one, having a good plan and process already in place is definitely needed.
After finding out the roles & responsibilities of each Special Council member, a specific game plan can be laid out for each. Like you mentioned above, it is a much different task of replacing a technical person vs. one specializing in brand relations, legal, or partnerships.
Your topic will be automatically closing in less than 24 hours. Are you content with the feedback received, or do you wish to extend community discussion for a further 7 days?
If we do not hear from you within 48 hours after your topic closes, your topic will be moved straight to the AIP Draft process.
Thank you @JoshBobrowsky for your ideas and the ApeCoin DAO community for the thoughtful discussions. A moderator will get in touch with the author to draft the AIP in the appropriate template. Once the AIP is drafted and meets all the DAO-approved guidelines, the proposal will be posted on Snapshot for live official voting at: Snapshot
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments. @JoshBobrowsky please see your messages for the next steps.
This Topic has been rejected based on the DAO-approved guidelines due to no response in the last 30 days. The Topic may be submitted again by any user and upon approval, will be open for 7 days for community discussions.
This Topic will move and remain in the Withdrawn AIPs category.