Iteration takes time. 2-3 months is a good time to make improvement through Q&A. Our AIP-141 slowly improves in this process
Community driven accelerator to achieve product market fit. No idea is bad idea, it is just not refined and it takes time to build community, product to get recognized.
Therefore, regular voting schedule would help, but voting on projects that are not mature enough, the result would be still the same - rejection. The better question is — How can we as a team to improve quality of the proposal?
(1) Transparent communication
(2) Active forum involvement
(3) Community driven accelerator would be the potential solutions
Thank you @dyorjdr for your ideas and the ApeCoin DAO community for the thoughtful discussions. A moderator will get in touch with the author to draft the AIP in the appropriate template. Once the AIP is drafted and meets all the DAO-approved guidelines, the proposal will be posted on Snapshot for live official voting at: Snapshot
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments. @dyorjdr please see your messages for the next steps.