Something similar to this discussion can be either some type of Conviction based or Merit based governance (apart from the already discussed options in previous posts : Quadratic Voting Threat Assessment)
In conviction based governance your voting power scales exponentially according to your lockup period whereas in merit based governance, one gets a certain number of points (at a level) which can be allocated to specific fields according to the background and track record of the individual. With more and more successful
Think of it like the character design menu in an RPG game where instead of spending (limited) points on the attributes you want, you pick in what matters you get a bigger say and what matters you have little say into.
It’s a very interesting topic to get into, looking forward to your thoughts on this @bigbull