@Balou thanks for your feedback. I appreciate your perspective!
The core of your feedback seems to be, in your words, āfinancially rewarding people will backfire.ā
This isnāt a novel concept. Communist regimes practiced variations of withholding for years - only rewarding the people at the top and letting everyone else work with little rewards for the good of the country. Most assessments are that they had little success. But itās not how ApeCoin DAO works and it is not how human behavior words. Iāll address both points below:
1. Itās not how ApeCoin DAO works.
The purpose of the DAO is to engage in governance processes that disperse ApeCoin to people in ways that drive our collective vision forward and increase value and utility for ApeCoin holders. People make proposals, they ask for ApeCoin / $$, and then - if the community votes yes - they receive those funds.
The DAO works this way because itās been demonstrated for centuries - long before web3 - that the best way to create value in communities is to invest in those same communities. āInvestā means not just investing in people at the top. It means investing in everyone - from paying engineers to build stuff to funding education for kids. Without investment, communities largely fail.
If as a DAO we believe that, in your words, āfinancially rewarding participation will backfireā, that requires reimagining how the DAO functions at the most core, basic levels - and the outcome wouldnāt be good. It also requires reimagining how humanity functions. Weāll get to that next!
1. Itās not how humanity works.
The reason communities (and businesses and nonprofits) often succeed with investment and largely fail without it is because all humans share a hierarchy of needs that was famously described by Maslow (and also by many others):
To spend more of our time creating real value in our communities - like innovating, problem solving, contributing our talents, building extraordinary relationships, having tons of fun - people need to have a certain basic set of needs met. They need shelter, food, healthcare, education, etc. In our society, they get that through rewards or compensation for their contributions.
Those communities that decide that people donāt need to be rewarded for the contributions they make to the community are immediately disqualifying all of the people who may want to create immense value for the community, but canāt actually do itā¦ because they must meet other obligations to fulfill their basic needs first.
This is why great innovations and value-creation tended not to happen in communist countries. It is also why small nonprofits (which Iāve spent years of my life supporting) have such a hard time creating sustained, meaningful value. When you donāt reward and recognize people appropriatelyā¦ you donāt get many people capable of helping for sustained periods of time.
Iāll repeat that last line because itās so important:
When you donāt reward and recognize people appropriatelyā¦ you donāt get many people capable of helping for sustained periods of time.
Last thought
I do not believe it should be controversial to say people deserve to be rewarded and recognized for the contributions they make to our community. The impact - if we look to nearly every kind of community that exists on this earth - should be more engagement, more value created, and more demand created for ApeCoin.
Additionally, if weāre on this forum, itās likely that we already agree: We are practicing this principal with every vote for a proposal that asks for APE or $$.
Thank APE simply allows us to scale our impact: it allows us to reward and recognize all the value created in the DAO. It allows us to steward people from being passively interested to actively engaged in this community that we all care about. It allows us to make ApeCoin everything we know it can be!
Again, thanks for your feedback. Iām happy to discuss more with you anytime! - Daniel