Hi @foxSlightly,
Thanks for submitting your Idea for implementing some new criteria and processes for roles in the DAO.
It may be helpful to specify exactly what your expectations there are for implementation of the final proposal.
- Would these requirements extend to members of the Working Groups & the Initiatives therein, such as the Ape Assembly?
We set a criteria to meet Trust Level 2 for the Discourse Facilitator proposal.
That single criteria was generally well received, it was also seemingly an effective way to not only surface qualified members, but also to set a bar for other members to strive for (one which requires at least 2 weeks of consistency).
Since one of the stated roles of the Special Council is to review the content of proposals prior to voting, a Trust Level 3 requirement could make sense, however, this could become a seriously limiting factor for attracting members who are otherwise qualified. (see Phase 6)
- Since there are various community roles in the DAO, and likely more to come, would it make sense to differentiate these criteria for some of the specific roles which are already established?
- How do you feel about using Trust Levels as a way to measure your expected qualifications?
Interestingly, we can customize the standard forum criteria to reach the various Trust Levels, which is something you could propose the changes for here.
This whole concept is a discussion that I’ve had with several members of our DAO many times and in various settings, it’s nice to see a more formal discussion.
Thank you,
These comments are solely my personal opinion and do not represent the views of the Ape Foundation.