Requiring super majority or a fee on certain proposals

[badteeth]

Cross-posting from the other super-majority thread to share some of the data:

AIP-265: 2/3 "Supermajority" Requirement to Alter Fundamental Tenets of ApeCoin DAO and its Operations

Supermajority voting can be useful, but I fail to see its effectiveness in our current token-weighted voting system. It would exacerbate the ability for whale voters to determine the outcome of votes as opposed to representing the will of the people voting. Take AIP-239 for example. It passed with 4.1m votes in favor to 3.3m votes against, but this would have failed a 2/3 supermajority vote. If you dig into the numbers you’ll see that 43.5% of the for/against votes were cast by only two wallet…