Hey there @tmay314 , glad to see you so passionate on this topic. If you haven’t already done so, I encourage you to check out the following previous posts, and comments, as it might help shape your proposal.
Abstract
There is currently no staking pool available to Otherside deed holders, other than the public pool. As such, Othersider holders receive the same staking benefits as the general public. This staking structure does not acknowledge or align with the important role the Otherside plays within the ApeCoin ecosystem. Providing higher reward yields to Othersider holders would be mutually beneficial to ApeCoin and the Otherside: ApeCoin holders would be encouraged to hold Otherside deeds, and O…
Proposal Name : Otherdeeds Staking Pool Allocation
Proposal Category : Ecosystem Fund Allocation
Abstract
The Otherside is an important driver of ApeCoin value and utility, yet Otherdeed NFTs were left out of AIPs 21 & 22. This AIP proposes to implement a staking system for Otherdeed NFT holders whereby participants can stake ApeCoin and receive additional ApeCoin from a preset pool over a set period of time.
Motivation
Staking models promote growth of the related token and NFT ecosystem by…
Abstract
After the successful vote for AIP-21&22, this AIP proposes a mechanism to introduce differentiating utility for MAYC M2 vs M1. This proposal is to increase the ApeCoin rewards by 50% from 2,042 to 3,063 for MAYC M2.
Motivation
By increasing the ApeCoin Rewards for MAYC M2 NFT, staking participations will be able to benefit from the differentiated utility and bringing more demand and awareness to the MAYC collection.
Rationale
It’s aesthetically and financially evident there is a bi…
Rather than rehash the arguments that inevitably emerge from proposals of this nature, I recommend checking out the discussions on these, particularly the first one. Some great exchanges going on here that might help you when considering your proposal.
15 Likes