This is good start, it really should have been before the SC election process. I don’t agree to all the points mentioned but it starts the process and can be refined with feedback from the community and also with contributions from candidates who are running now for SC.
Misalignment of expectations can be a big drain of energy and not productive, this goes both ways btw (also expectations of the DAO community members).
Thank you for your ideas [and the ApeCoin DAO community for the thoughtful discussions]. A moderator will get in touch with the author to draft the AIP in the appropriate template. Once the AIP is drafted and meets all the DAO-approved guidelines, the proposal will be posted on Snapshot for live official voting at: Snapshot
Follow this Topic as further updates will be posted here in the comments. @badteeth please see your messages for the next steps.
I fully support this proposal to establish a clear understanding of the current responsibilities of the special souncil. Transparency is one of our guiding values, and this proposal aligns with that principle.
Not just responsibilities. Clarity on risks and who would bear the costs… SC has paid-for legal protection, and possibly insurance.
And transparency - at least an outline - on what is actually done day-to-day vs. responsibilities and expectations.
That should’ve been the minimum all along. We can start with this initiative, but it isn’t close to what’s required to alleviate the confusion and consternation over the role, or to gauge what it should be monetarily valued at.
All important things to understand, but the goal of this AIP is just to get a baseline understanding of the role. This will help guide the next round of community discussion around the SC role and its place in the DAO’s governance process. Thank you,
After review, this Topic submitted by @badteeth is ready for vote under AIP-282. The proposal will be posted on Snapshot at the next weekly release date and time, which is every Thursday at 9PM EST.
The AIP implementation is administered by the Ape Foundation. Implementation may be immaterially or materially altered to optimise for security, usability, to protect APE holders, and otherwise to effect the intent of the AIP. Any material deviations from an AIP, as initially approved, will be disclosed to the APE holder community.
This proposal is live for Snapshot vote at Snapshot. The voting period closes next Wednesday at 9PM EST.
The AIP implementation is administered by the Ape Foundation. Implementation may be immaterially or materially altered to optimize for security, usability, to protect APE holders, and otherwise to effect the intent of the AIP. Any material deviations from an AIP, as initially approved, will be disclosed to the APE holder community.