AIP Execution and Transparency - Add tags for completed / not completed, funded / not funded
Then it is easy to sort the ones with implementation updates or not.
Just because and AIP passes it doesn’t mean they have the funds. We should have a tag for when the AIP has actually received the funds. Also we should update this section with the date the funds are received in the post.
Seems like a no brainer improvement for the forum.
Hopefully this one too will be done without the need for a proposal AIP-497: Restore Elections Data Visibility
I just updated and expanded this idea to include:
funded / not funded
Also I think to add a tag 0 cost as well.
I think to be able to search quickly for those that took funds vs those that didn’t would be useful.
Operational
Changes to DAO operations, which usually are 0 cost, but are very different from say 0 cost for use of the IP like the ApeCoin Rugs.
Lastly, in the future to have a Constitutional tag for major changes that would require a supermajority to pass.
That is probably enough tags.
What about things that are partially funded? Like if an author receives the funding in tranches. Would they be considered funded or not funded?
Good question. How many AIPs would this category apply to? We could add:
Funded
Partially Funded
Fully Funded
For reference, this is the proposal that I have in progress and which would contain most of this data in one place AIP-508: Update AIP Tracking Data
